Practice

AO. “organization” as both a social body as well as broad discourses

AO: The analysts argue that double binds are created and sustained by work within organizations. They define “organization” both as a social body in which intersubjective exchange is

MESO: (How) are power relations said to shape the dynamics of collaboration at this research stage? What organizations are said to shape collaborations?

Fortun, Kim, and Todd Cherkasky. “Counter‐expertise and the Politics of Collaboration.” Science as Culture 7, no. 2 (June 1998): 145–72.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Wood and Gray - "commonality of experience"

AO: As the analyst’s definition showed (see Micro), they assume that a good collaborator follows the shared rules, norms and structures to act/decide. They note that the

NANO: What traits does the analyst believe make a good collaborator? Is the analyst interested in how the collaboration stabilizes or how it fails or shifts?

Wood, Donna J., and Barbara Gray. 1991. “Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27 (2): 139–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Cervone - nano

AO: Citing Kelty, the analyst calls collaboration: “mutifaceted and rhizomic” and asks if it could be too weak of a word to describe the entanglements of complicity, cultural

NANO: What traits does the analyst believe make a good collaborator? Is the analyst interested in how the collaboration stabilizes or how it fails or shifts?

Cervone, Emma. 2015. “The Promises and Conundrums of Decolonized Collaboration.” In Indigenous Studies and Engaged Anthropology: The Collaborative Moment, edited by Paul Sillitoe, 95–114. Farnham, Surrey, UK ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Growing number of interdisciplinary journals

AO: Not mentioned but the creation of numerous journals that touch on econ and psych are noted.

TECHNO: (How) are technological infrastructures said to shape, enable and constrain collaboration at this stage of the research process?

Handgraaf, Michel J. J., and W. Fred van Raaij. 2005. “Fear and Loathing No More: The Emergence of Collaboration between Economists and Psychologists.” Journal of Economic Psychology, Tilburg Symposium on Psychology and Economics: Games and Decisions, 26

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Fortun and Cherkasky. Nano.

AO: The editors explicitly call the diversity within direct advocacy organizations as “collaboration” rather than collegiality or solidarity (which connote sameness of those who work...Read more

NANO: What traits does the analyst believe make a good collaborator? Is the analyst interested in how the collaboration stabilizes or how it fails or shifts?

Fortun, Kim, and Todd Cherkasky. “Guest Editorial: Strategizing Counter‐expertise.” Science as Culture 7, no. 2 (June 1998): 141–44.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

Fortun, Michael. “Institutionalizing Indirection: Science at the Crossroads of Scholarship and Politics.” Science as Culture 7, no. 2 (June 1998): 173–92.

In this article, Mike Fortun discusses discusses the complicated double-binds that impacted his "response-ability" while working in and on the Institute for Science and Interdisciplinary Studies (ISIS).Read more

AO. institutional affiliation

AO: The analysts note that increasingly, the only way to identify whether someone is a psychologist or economist is to look at their institutional affiliation.

MESO: (How) are power relations said to shape the dynamics of collaboration at this research stage? What organizations are said to shape collaborations?

Handgraaf, Michel J. J., and W. Fred van Raaij. 2005. “Fear and Loathing No More: The Emergence of Collaboration between Economists and Psychologists.” Journal of Economic Psychology, Tilburg Symposium on Psychology and Economics: Games and Decisions, 26

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Fortun and Cherkasky. Micro.

AO: Fortun and Cherkasky introduce essays that speak from the “messy middle” between the university and direct engagements with politics to suggest how “critiques of expertise can...Read more

MICRO: What did the analyst choose to describe as collaboration?

Fortun, Kim, and Todd Cherkasky. “Guest Editorial: Strategizing Counter‐expertise.” Science as Culture 7, no. 2 (June 1998): 141–44.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Wood and Gray - discursive risk

AO: This is a discourse analysis of the way that organizational theorists are thinking about collaboration (authors map nine papers over 6 domains of collaboration to

DISCURSIVE RISKS: What are the epistemic assumptions of the analyst of collaboration?

Wood, Donna J., and Barbara Gray. 1991. “Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27 (2): 139–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. convening power can help to facilitate collaboration

AO: A convening power that has legitimacy among the stakeholders and the authority to organize the domain as well as an unbiased and even-handed approach to the problem

MESO: (How) are power relations said to shape the dynamics of collaboration at this research stage? What organizations are said to shape collaborations?

Wood, Donna J., and Barbara Gray. 1991. “Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27 (2): 139–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Cervone - deutero

AO: The analyst is interested in power differentials within researcher-researched relationships and understanding why Anthroplogists are now (again) interested in engagement. She is

DEUTERO: How is this analyst denoting and worrying about collaboration?

Cervone, Emma. 2015. “The Promises and Conundrums of Decolonized Collaboration.” In Indigenous Studies and Engaged Anthropology: The Collaborative Moment, edited by Paul Sillitoe, 95–114. Farnham, Surrey, UK ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Cervone - meta

AO: The analysts leverages scholarship critiqing the “lone (male) ethnographer” to highlight the inherently interactive process of knowledge production.

META: What discourses does the analyst consider/leverage to characterize/theorize collaboration at this research stage? (How) are histories and contextual factors pointed to as shaping the collaborations described here at this research stage?

Cervone, Emma. 2015. “The Promises and Conundrums of Decolonized Collaboration.” In Indigenous Studies and Engaged Anthropology: The Collaborative Moment, edited by Paul Sillitoe, 95–114. Farnham, Surrey, UK ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

Search form